JohnO: I bet he can remember where he has his bank accounts.
Victor: Depends who is asking.
Radio Transcripts Ltd: Bet he can remember regularly meeting his old school friend too, the liar.
JohnO: Who says he met him regularly? And he was the younger brother of a school friend.
Rich80105: whose telephone number he just happened to have in his phone . . .
JohnO: Yes, Dickbot. Did it occur to you that not every number in Key's phone was a childhood friend? Did the thought ever burrow into that tiny, atrophied abscess you call a brain, that the number is in there because they know each other professionally? Number in a phone... seriously, this is a low even for you, Dickbot.
Rich80105: You seem to be forgetting that Key told us this was only a casual acquaintance who he had known briefly as the brother of a school friend, who he had not met for years.
JohnO: Of course I was not forgetting that you dimwit. That is what I said.
JohnO: The State Services Commission rejected them!
Rich80105: just happened to have the number of this person he didn't really know
JohnO: Who says he didn't really know him?
Rich80105: so rang him and didn;t seek any other nominations.
JohnO: So?
Rich80105: There was also a suggestion that he was so anonymous people would not be able to remember his face - sounds ideal for a National friend . . .
JohnO: Irrelevant drivel from Dickbot, as usual.
Rich80105: And of course despite his hands-on involvement in the selection at every stage - John Key blithely asserted that he had nothing to do with the appointment . . .
JohnO: Nonsense. He has clearly stated that he was involved by suggesting to the applicant that he should apply.
Rich80105: Indeed - his conflicting statements, some forced by the evidence of others, make it clear that Key lied.
JohnO: After that, the process was handled by the Rennie, as Rennie has clearly stated. Are you claiming now that Rennie lied? That would not surprise me - lefties have a habit of attacking civil servants who don't do their bidding.
Rich80105: Key and Rennie have made it clear that it was John Key that rejected all previous candidates, approached anotehr person personally, selected that candidate after interview without seekign any other candidates, and made the decision to employ. He may not have been invovled in getting him to sign up and sign a letter of appointment, but that is not, at least yet, a cause for concern. Do you find it worrying that our prime minister has lied?
JohnO: The thing is, Key can claim his memory fade. Just like Shearer claims to somehow forget a bank account with hundreds of thousands of US$ in it for his pecuniary interests declaration, while simultaneously remembering it for his tax returns, four years running. Bad memories these politicians. Of course forgetting a phone conversation made a year ago is a bit different to forgetting, repeatedly, about all that money.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/nz.general/Radio$20Transcripts$20Ltd%7Csort:date/nz.general/WTIyQ9YV0Dk/t-ZHPLGVQjEJ
No comments:
Post a Comment