On Saturday morning a Kiwi hero returns. What time does Pete Bethune arrive back in Auckland? Anybody know?
Saturday night---another group of Kiwi heroes goes into action. Let's hope the All Blacks play with something like the raw courage, integrity and tenacity displayed by Pete Bethune and his crew.
Go the All Blacks!!!
Click here to Reply
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
 |
- show quoted text -
New Zealand's slaughterhouses violate no international laws. Pete
threw harmless butyric acid at those pirates, not something dangerous
or harmful as your use of the word "acid" would imply.
threw harmless butyric acid at those pirates, not something dangerous
or harmful as your use of the word "acid" would imply.
Your analogy is not only inappropriate, it's harebrained.
|
On Jul 8, 9:18 am, Patrick FitzGerald <a...@b.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT), Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday morning a Kiwi hero returns. What time does Pete Bethune
> >arrive back in Auckland? Anybody know?
>
> Bethune a hero!!
>
> You gotta be joking.
>
> By his stupidity in trying to arrest a Japanese captain Bethune has
> shown he is a Buffoon.
>
> Patrick
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT), Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday morning a Kiwi hero returns. What time does Pete Bethune
> >arrive back in Auckland? Anybody know?
>
> Bethune a hero!!
>
> You gotta be joking.
>
> By his stupidity in trying to arrest a Japanese captain Bethune has
> shown he is a Buffoon.
>
> Patrick
Do you actually do any serious research before you fly into print?
Bethune tried to serve the captain of that illegal whaling ship with a
writ for the damage inflicted on his boat. He was fully entitled to do
that. The New Zealand government was obliged to support one of their
citizens when he was assaulted and kidnapped by a rogue regime. But of
course, they won't even support one of their own members of parliament
when he is manhandled in New Zealand by foreign goons, so I'm sure
Pete did not really expect even token governmental support.
Bethune tried to serve the captain of that illegal whaling ship with a
writ for the damage inflicted on his boat. He was fully entitled to do
that. The New Zealand government was obliged to support one of their
citizens when he was assaulted and kidnapped by a rogue regime. But of
course, they won't even support one of their own members of parliament
when he is manhandled in New Zealand by foreign goons, so I'm sure
Pete did not really expect even token governmental support.
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
7/8/10
|
|
On Jul 8, 6:23 pm, Brian Dooley <bria...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT), Mo
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT), Mo
>
- show quoted text -
What? A draw?
7/8/10
|
|
- show quoted text -
What? Curly and Sh--- ? Oh! Buwahahahahahahahahahaaaaa! Oh, Alvey, you
kill moi!
kill moi!
7/8/10
|
|
- show quoted text -
7/9/10
|
7/9/10
|
7/9/10
|
7/10/10
|
7/10/10
|
|
On Jul 10, 7:29 pm, John Cawston <rewar...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
> On Saturday, 10/Jul-2010 7:18 p.m., Pooh wrote:
> > "Dave Doe"<h...@work.ok> wrote in message> On Saturday, 10/Jul-2010 7:18 p.m., Pooh wrote:
> >news:MPG.
> >> In article<i1434t$ru...@news.
> >> says...
>
> >>> "Dave Doe"<h...@work.ok> wrote in message
> >>>news:MPG.
> >>>> In article<i136ja$8t...@news.
> >>>> says...
>
> >>>>> "Mo"<morrisseybr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
- show quoted text -
>
> the harassment of the Jap boat and its boarding either meets the definition of the laws
> of piracy.. or war.
> the harassment of the Jap boat and its boarding either meets the definition of the laws
> of piracy.. or war.
Pete Bethune was the pirate?!!?? Not the scoff-law whaling boat that
abducted him to Japan? Even by the Cawstonian Scale of Absurdity, that
must be one of the loopiest things you've ever posted.
abducted him to Japan? Even by the Cawstonian Scale of Absurdity, that
must be one of the loopiest things you've ever posted.
>
> Regardless of the emotion around the issue,
It's not merely emotion. It's international law at stake here.> Regardless of the emotion around the issue,
>
> the whaling carried out by
> the Japs is *not* remotely an issue of conservation and risk to the
> (mainly) Minke whale. The take is tiny compared to the reproductive
> capacity of the species.
>
> At issue is the attitude of some to humanise various species
> the whaling carried out by
> the Japs is *not* remotely an issue of conservation and risk to the
> (mainly) Minke whale. The take is tiny compared to the reproductive
> capacity of the species.
>
> At issue is the attitude of some to humanise various species
Nonsense. You're ascribing a motive to the anti-whaling protestors
that you want them to have.
that you want them to have.
>
> and try to equate the killing of animals with that of human beings.
> and try to equate the killing of animals with that of human beings.
Who said that? Other than yourself or the profoundly dishonest PR
shill Glenn Inwood?
shill Glenn Inwood?
7/10/10
|
|
On Jul 10, 10:57 pm, lord shineything <shineyth...@yahoo.com> unwisely
tries to be clever:
> On Jul 8, 11:41 am, Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 8, 9:16 am, lord shineything <shineyth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 8, 8:26 am, Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Saturday morning a Kiwi hero returns. What time does Pete Bethune
> > > > arrive back in Auckland? Anybody know?
>
> > > Hero? Lord Shiney finds himself wondering what word Mo would use to
> > > describe a Japanese activist who started throwing acid etc around in
> > > one of NZ's large number of slaughterhouses...
>
> > New Zealand's slaughterhouses violate no international laws.
>
> Neither does Japan's whaling.
tries to be clever:
> On Jul 8, 11:41 am, Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 8, 9:16 am, lord shineything <shineyth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 8, 8:26 am, Mo <morrisseybr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Saturday morning a Kiwi hero returns. What time does Pete Bethune
> > > > arrive back in Auckland? Anybody know?
>
> > > Hero? Lord Shiney finds himself wondering what word Mo would use to
> > > describe a Japanese activist who started throwing acid etc around in
> > > one of NZ's large number of slaughterhouses...
>
> > New Zealand's slaughterhouses violate no international laws.
>
> Neither does Japan's whaling.
Yes it does. That is the basis of the joint Australian-New Zealand
case against Japan.
case against Japan.
>
> In any event, Lord Shiney would have
> thought that, to someone supposedly arguing on ethical grounds, that
> that was hardly the point.
> In any event, Lord Shiney would have
> thought that, to someone supposedly arguing on ethical grounds, that
> that was hardly the point.
Why should the Sea Shepherd activists not use the fact that the law is
on their side? How does the fact that they are defending international
law in any way diminish from the moral and humanitarian force of their
argument?
on their side? How does the fact that they are defending international
law in any way diminish from the moral and humanitarian force of their
argument?
>
> > Pete
> > threw harmless butyric acid at those pirates, not something dangerous
> > or harmful as your use of the word "acid" would imply.
>
> > Your analogy is not only inappropriate, it's harebrained.
>
> And Mo's, I'm afraid, is hypocritcal. With a capital H.
> > Pete
> > threw harmless butyric acid at those pirates, not something dangerous
> > or harmful as your use of the word "acid" would imply.
>
> > Your analogy is not only inappropriate, it's harebrained.
>
> And Mo's, I'm afraid, is hypocritcal. With a capital H.
How so? The fact that the Sea Shepherd case is legally AND morally
watertight makes me a hypocrite how, exactly?
watertight makes me a hypocrite how, exactly?
7/11/10
|
7/11/10
|
7/11/10
|
7/11/10
|
|
- show quoted text -
Not when that ship is breaking international law. Bethune and Sea
Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
7/11/10
|
|
- show quoted text -
Bethune's boat was rammed by a ship engaged in an illegal activity.
>
> Bethune and Sea
>
> > Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
> > would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
>
> Bethune and Sea
> Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
> would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
>
> Maybe the New Zealand and Australian Governments have more important
> things to do.
> Bethune and Sea
>
> > Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
> > would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
>
> Bethune and Sea
> Shepherd were doing what the New Zealand and Australian governments
> would have done if they had an ounce of courage.
>
> Maybe the New Zealand and Australian Governments have more important
> things to do.
What is more important than sticking up for your own citizens when
they suffer an act of piracy at the hands of a scoff-law regime?
they suffer an act of piracy at the hands of a scoff-law regime?
>
> Then run around
> After hippies who have the warm fussy over a fish.
> Then run around
> After hippies who have the warm fussy over a fish.
Your indolence and your ignorance are so obvious I won't even point
out the three glaring errors in that sentence.
out the three glaring errors in that sentence.
> I see that loser got a total of three supporters when he crawled back
> into the country.
> into the country.
You're fantasising. Bethune has a great number of admirers---in Japan,
as well as in this country.
>
> http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/
as well as in this country.
>
> http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/
No comments:
Post a Comment