The other day I tuned my car radio into Radio Sport and for a while
listened to that idiot Martin Devlin's show. A regular contributor,
calling himself "The Man in the Stand", was complaining, in a
grating, whining voice, about the behaviour of some Brumbies players
in a Dunedin bar following the Brumbies' thrashing at the hands of
the Otago Highlanders a couple of hours earlier. He was especially
incensed by the cold-blooded outrage perpetrated against him by one of
these uncouth Australian ruffians.
listened to that idiot Martin Devlin's show. A regular contributor,
calling himself "The Man in the Stand", was complaining, in a
grating, whining voice, about the behaviour of some Brumbies players
in a Dunedin bar following the Brumbies' thrashing at the hands of
the Otago Highlanders a couple of hours earlier. He was especially
incensed by the cold-blooded outrage perpetrated against him by one of
these uncouth Australian ruffians.
Apparently the Man in the Stand (a diehard Canterbury supporter) got
himself embroiled in an altercation with a group of the ACT players.
Dude must have been passing obnoxious comments about Australians, or
something equally stoo-pid, because, as he told Devlin, "verbals"
started to fly between him and the players.
himself embroiled in an altercation with a group of the ACT players.
Dude must have been passing obnoxious comments about Australians, or
something equally stoo-pid, because, as he told Devlin, "verbals"
started to fly between him and the players.
As dude tells the story, he hurled a devastatingly cruel epithet at
the Brumbies: "LOSERS!" he shouted.
the Brumbies: "LOSERS!" he shouted.
One or two of the Brumbies replied: "YOU are calling US losers? What
about that team YOU support? LOSER."
about that team YOU support? LOSER."
The contre-temps proceeded in this witty fashion for a while, with all
involved growing steadily testier. Then the afore-mentioned outrage
was perpetrated by the Australian thug. What happened was this...
involved growing steadily testier. Then the afore-mentioned outrage
was perpetrated by the Australian thug. What happened was this...
"As I moved to the bar," said the Man in the Stand, "a famous Wallaby
player FLICKED ME on the back of the neck with his forefinger." And I
swear the Man in the Stand was starting to choke up as he recounted
this. "It REALLY hurt," he said.
player FLICKED ME on the back of the neck with his forefinger." And I
swear the Man in the Stand was starting to choke up as he recounted
this. "It REALLY hurt," he said.
I wonder if any of our readers was in that Dunedin bar on Friday night
and happened to see this incident. If so, would you please tell us
the name of the player who flicked this whining tosspot on the back of
the neck. I want to send a bouquet to the Brumbies organisation.
and happened to see this incident. If so, would you please tell us
the name of the player who flicked this whining tosspot on the back of
the neck. I want to send a bouquet to the Brumbies organisation.
Thanking you in anticipation....
Phelatio <free...@kaimataREMOVE.co.nz
world's dumbest sports broadcaster in message
news:<3EAFB446...@
>
> Martin is certainly no idiot,
ignorance.
world's dumbest sports broadcaster in message
news:<3EAFB446...@
First he takes moi to task for my statement that I listened to Martin
Devlin's joke of a show for opnly a short time...
>
> ... given the huge detail your post goes into,...
Devlin's joke of a show for opnly a short time...
>
> ... given the huge detail your post goes into,...
Possibly he meant to write "fine" detail. How can detail be "huge"?
But we'll let that one be for now...
But we'll let that one be for now...
>
> you must have listened to it for more than a while !
> you must have listened to it for more than a while !
The Man in the Stand was whimpering for three minutes - max.
>
> Martin is certainly no idiot,
Any football fan would disagree. Certainly all his colleagues hold
him in contempt. Just see what Joseph Romanos has written in the
Listener about Devlin over several years if you doubt me. And the All
Blacks nearly all refuse to speak to him. Devlin is an idiot.
him in contempt. Just see what Joseph Romanos has written in the
Listener about Devlin over several years if you doubt me. And the All
Blacks nearly all refuse to speak to him. Devlin is an idiot.
>
> ... he has the best recall of sports events, historic and recent, than
> ... he has the best recall of sports events, historic and recent, than
[sic!]
> ... any other host on Radio Sport,
> ... any other host on Radio Sport,
That's nonsense. Telfer, Hill, Deaker, Doug Golightly, even poor old
Darcy freakin' Waldegrave know more about sports than this twit.
Clearly he never reads anything about sport other than the back page
of the morning paper.
Darcy freakin' Waldegrave know more about sports than this twit.
Clearly he never reads anything about sport other than the back page
of the morning paper.
>
> sure he may have a rant every now and again...
> sure he may have a rant every now and again...
You mean like after the World Cup semi-final loss to France, when the
cretin behaved so obnoxiously that the All Blacks to a man vowed never
to speak to him again?
cretin behaved so obnoxiously that the All Blacks to a man vowed never
to speak to him again?
>
> ( a bit like yourself really) don't we all ?
Sure we do. But not with Devlin's viciousness and blithering> ( a bit like yourself really) don't we all ?
ignorance.
>
> it's a laugh, and at least he is honest about his opinions...
> it's a laugh, and at least he is honest about his opinions...
So he can say anything, no matter how absurd, and it's all just "a
laugh"? If Devlin was funny, it might be a different matter. But
he's not.
laugh"? If Devlin was funny, it might be a different matter. But
he's not.
> maybe you were listening out for Teller,
[sic!]
>
> now there's a first class bonifide...
> now there's a first class bonifide...
[sic!]
>
> ... idiot !
> ... idiot !
Brendan Telfer is a supercilious, priggis twerp, but he knows a lot
about sports and he respects both his audience and his subject.
Devlin does neither.
about sports and he respects both his audience and his subject.
Devlin does neither.
(Look for my up coming post analysing Devlin...)
 |
Our friend "Tony Elson" <jac...@clear.net.nz> attempts to embarrass
moi in message news:<3eb0326b$1...@clear.net.nz>
>
>
> No, it was a Wellington bar. They had travelled.
> >
> > As dude tells the story, he hurled a devastatingly cruel epithet at
> > the Brumbies: "LOSERS!" he shouted.
> >
>
> Wrong again. It was a Brumbies player calling him a loser for cheering for
> the CC's in their game against the Bulls.
>
> Rest of the bollocks snipped. You are the whiney one.
moi in message news:<3eb0326b$1...@clear.net.nz>
>
>
> No, it was a Wellington bar. They had travelled.
Hey, I was drivin' my damn car! So I got the bar, the city, indeed
the freakin' ISLAND wrong. Yeah, I was sloppy and unprofessional. So
call me a rugby journalist if ya want! What I DIDN'T get wrong was
this: the Man in the Stand was so indignant, even several days later,
that he was nearly in tears.
the freakin' ISLAND wrong. Yeah, I was sloppy and unprofessional. So
call me a rugby journalist if ya want! What I DIDN'T get wrong was
this: the Man in the Stand was so indignant, even several days later,
that he was nearly in tears.
Then this writer - moi! - was careless enough to describe the
blubbering Man in the Stand as "a diehard Canterbury supporter". Mr
Elson's response to that slip-up is wift and withering...
blubbering Man in the Stand as "a diehard Canterbury supporter". Mr
Elson's response to that slip-up is wift and withering...
>
> Wrong again. He is a diehard Canes supporter. Gee you dumb.
> Wrong again. He is a diehard Canes supporter. Gee you dumb.
Ulp! But that's not all! There's even more of an ass-kicking for
yours truly...
yours truly...
> >
> > As dude tells the story, he hurled a devastatingly cruel epithet at
> > the Brumbies: "LOSERS!" he shouted.
> >
>
> Wrong again. It was a Brumbies player calling him a loser for cheering for
> the CC's in their game against the Bulls.
>
> Rest of the bollocks snipped. You are the whiney one.
Oh come on! You know THAT ain't true.
>
> While I don't like
> "Man in the Stand" much myself, your total misrepresentation gives you the
> aura of tosser extraordinairre
> While I don't like
> "Man in the Stand" much myself, your total misrepresentation gives you the
> aura of tosser extraordinairre
[sic!]
>
> - much like a lot of the stuff you spout around here.
> - much like a lot of the stuff you spout around here.
Ooooh, wicked blow to the old Breen self-esteem.
Still, you have not in any way countered my original two points, viz.
1.) the Man in the Stand is a whining tosser, and 2.) Martin Devlin is
an idiot.
1.) the Man in the Stand is a whining tosser, and 2.) Martin Devlin is
an idiot.
ERRATUM:
In my earlier reply to this fellow "Tony Elson" <jac...@clot.nz> who
had foolishly attempted to attack moi in message
news:<3eb0326b$1...@clear.net.nz>
had foolishly attempted to attack moi in message
news:<3eb0326b$1...@clear.net.nz>
The word "wift" which appears in my reply to Mr Elson should of course
be "swift".
be "swift".
Awright, awright, awright... so you c'n call me sloppy and
unprofessional. BUTCHA CAN'T CALL ME A DEVLIN...
unprofessional. BUTCHA CAN'T CALL ME A DEVLIN...
On Sat, 3 May 2003 16:55:23 +0200, "Donnie" <donnieN...@voila.fr>
wrote:
wrote:
- show quoted text -
The point here is that Mowissey is a complete, utter and absolute
twat. The fact that he minces and ponces around like a great big
raving Jessie is beside the point. Although absolutely true.
twat. The fact that he minces and ponces around like a great big
raving Jessie is beside the point. Although absolutely true.
-- rick boyd
|
After being upbraided by Donnie for his homophobic comments, "Mr
Scebe" <mr_s...@bigotmail.com> writes mealy-mouthedly in message
news:<bVNsa.54204$mZ4.6...@
deletes the rest. (Hyuk, hyuk, hyuk!)
smoking a bit of hydroponic or something ....
rugby.
Scebe" <mr_s...@bigotmail.com> writes mealy-mouthedly in message
news:<bVNsa.54204$mZ4.6...@
>
> I was passing comment, no more, no less. If you want to find some homophobic
> overtones in that, then good luck.
> I was passing comment, no more, no less. If you want to find some homophobic
> overtones in that, then good luck.
"Gay" .... "Philadelphia, anyone?" .... Your sneering intent was
utterly clear. It's not a matter of "finding" homophobic overtones -
they're right through your post.
utterly clear. It's not a matter of "finding" homophobic overtones -
they're right through your post.
Then, arrogantly, Mr Scebe just dismisses Donnie's point as a mere
irritation.
irritation.
>
> I don't give a shit.
> I don't give a shit.
>
> I read what i want, and delete the rest.
Yeah right. Like he only reads the interviews in Penthouse and> I read what i want, and delete the rest.
deletes the rest. (Hyuk, hyuk, hyuk!)
>
> I find it more boring than shocking.
When have I written anything "shocking"? Huh! - maybe Mr Scebe is> I find it more boring than shocking.
smoking a bit of hydroponic or something ....
>
> If he was to actually write something about rugby, then i might get more interested.
Errrrr.... this writer - moi - has written a considerable amount about> If he was to actually write something about rugby, then i might get more interested.
rugby.
<sarcastic queenie voice>
Did you think you were on alt.gay.fantasies or something?
</sarcastic queenie voice>
Did you think you were on alt.gay.fantasies or something?
</sarcastic queenie voice>
5/4/03
|
|
"Mr Scebe" <mr_s...@hotmail.com> sails into moi in message
news:<h91ta.56411$mZ4.6...@
>
> Fuck, one tenuous thread about French rugby strength,
news:<h91ta.56411$mZ4.6...@
>
> In relation to your assumed non-de-plume. It had nothing to do with your
> sexual preferences.
> In relation to your assumed non-de-plume. It had nothing to do with your
> sexual preferences.
Oh no-o-o-o-o-o-o!!! Dude wants moi.
>
> If i was trying to do that, i would have written
> something like "Breen's a fucking screamer, with no more right to live on
> god's green earth than a weasel" - see the difference? It's pretty obvious.
> If i was trying to do that, i would have written
> something like "Breen's a fucking screamer, with no more right to live on
> god's green earth than a weasel" - see the difference? It's pretty obvious.
No. It's not obvious at all. Please try to express yourself more
clearly.
clearly.
>
> I generally manage the first two lines of your posts. After that, the substance of your
> assertions are so gone that i give up. I note that i'm not the only one.
> I generally manage the first two lines of your posts. After that, the substance of your
> assertions are so gone that i give up. I note that i'm not the only one.
Ha! Like them or loathe them, I know - and you know - that my posts
are always lucid and well-written. What substance of ANY of my posts
has been so "gone" that you "give up"? You're telling lies.
....<Snip confused bleating>.....
are always lucid and well-written. What substance of ANY of my posts
has been so "gone" that you "give up"? You're telling lies.
....<Snip confused bleating>.....
>
> Fuck, one tenuous thread about French rugby strength,
"Tenuous"? You fool - that argument is OVER. I provided lots of
evidence and I can provide tons more. Your only possible objection is
to my STYLE, which I am happy to note, really irritates you. But are
you really so bone-headed as to keep denying the strength of French
football? You MUST be a New Zealand rugby journalist. You MUST be!!!
evidence and I can provide tons more. Your only possible objection is
to my STYLE, which I am happy to note, really irritates you. But are
you really so bone-headed as to keep denying the strength of French
football? You MUST be a New Zealand rugby journalist. You MUST be!!!
>
> and then thousands of
> lines trying to prove to the world that you're not a dickhead (and failing
> dismally). I can see you were schooled at the "Ian Daley school of ng posting"
> and then thousands of
> lines trying to prove to the world that you're not a dickhead (and failing
> dismally). I can see you were schooled at the "Ian Daley school of ng posting"
Did you.... did you... did you just call moi a
DICKHEAD??!!?!?!?!??!?!?
<Man in the Stand-like whimper> Moi? Moi? </Man in the Stand-like
whimper>
DICKHEAD??!!?!?!?!??!?!?
<Man in the Stand-like whimper> Moi? Moi? </Man in the Stand-like
whimper>
Our friend Phelan <free...@kaimataREMOVE.co.nz
moi in message news:<3EBA4262...@
> >
>
> christ mate ! what are you on !!!!!!?!??!
moi in message news:<3EBA4262...@
> >
>
> christ mate ! what are you on !!!!!!?!??!
You want some, Phelan? I can get you what you want - but you gotta
come back for more...
come back for more...
5/9/03
|
|
Greig Blanchett <gre...@nzrfu.com> wrote in message news:<svlmbvg2e8g0hpkf9fb33f1s
> >
> >You want some, Phelan? I can get you what you want - but you gotta
> >come back for more...
>
> Congratulations, That Fuckwit Breen (TM), you passed my shit filter.
> Anything by you over 20 lines long usually means you're off your meds
> so goes straight in the bin. Mind you, looks like you need to up your
> dose - you're still not making any sense.
> >You want some, Phelan? I can get you what you want - but you gotta
> >come back for more...
>
> Congratulations, That Fuckwit Breen (TM), you passed my shit filter.
> Anything by you over 20 lines long usually means you're off your meds
> so goes straight in the bin. Mind you, looks like you need to up your
> dose - you're still not making any sense.
It was a line from a song, Mr Blanchett. Watch The Commitments and you'll get it...
Morrissey Breen
MAKING PERFECT SENSE SINCE STANDARD ONE.....
MAKING PERFECT SENSE SINCE STANDARD ONE.....
|
On 9 May 2003 20:18:40 -0700, morriss...@yahoo.com (Morrissey
Breen) wrote:
>It was a line from a song, Mr Blanchett. Watch The Commitments and you'll get it...
>
>Morrissey Breen
>MAKING PERFECT SENSE SINCE STANDARD ONE.....
Breen) wrote:
>It was a line from a song, Mr Blanchett. Watch The Commitments and you'll get it...
>
>Morrissey Breen
>MAKING PERFECT SENSE SINCE STANDARD ONE.....
All seven years of it.
-- rick boyd
No comments:
Post a Comment