Tuesday, 9 January 2018

Anyone out there prepared to sign up and cause Blubberguts some grief? (Dec. 7, 2014)

  1. Blubberguts is totally defiant, and unrepentant; his site just keeps getting worse.
    Anyone out there prepared to sign up and cause him some grief?
    Evil, disgusting racism did not die with “Sir” Paul Holmes. It is alive and festering quite openly in this country. Whether it emanates from Garth the Knife’s S.S. Trust, the ACT Party and a significant section of the National Party, talkback hosts (from one station in particular), the rabid talkback ranter Dame Lesley Max, or Kyle Chapman’s New Zealand National Front, the vilest bigotry is, sadly, an ongoing fact of life in New Zealand.
    One of the more depressing examples appeared on Blubberguts’s blog yesterday….
    http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/12/pandering-royalty-prince-paki-convicted/
    The article—allegedly written by Blubberguts, but more likely written for him by John Ansell—is bad enough, but the comments are even worse. In tone and in the level of intelligence, they are like something that might have been scrawled on a wall in Mississippi in the 1950s.
    Yes, I hear you say, these clowns are largely in an echo-chamber, and half of the comments are probably written by Blubberguts himself or by Carrick Graham, but they need to be confronted. I have been banned for life, unfortunately—it was something I said—but perhaps a few Standardisti might like to register on the site and start contradicting a few of these ninnies. It’s really easy; you can sign in with Discus, Twitter, Facebook or Google. See if you can last longer than I did: a year and a half.
    In case anyone’s interested, here’s one of my early threads from long ago (29 December 2012). It led to my first warning, and it came from Blubberguts himself: “Your idiocy of the past few days has not gone unnoticed, lift your game or fuck off.” ……
    http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2012/12/face-of-the-day-379/#disqus_thread
  2. Sirenia9
    I heard that Stuart Nash is a friend of Simon Lusk’s and Jordan Williams. So probably put on Q and A specifically to do such revisionism.
    • Morrissey9.1
      Thanks for that very interesting little bit of information. He’s not simply vacuous, as I thought this morning, he’s compromised.
    • Do you have a link for that?
      I’ve seen the assertion bandied around a bit, but it’s never been clear to me whether they approached him, or the other way around, and what exactly was the nature of the contact.
    • rawshark-yeshe9.3
      isn’t he a client of Lusk, as is the Nat party new tobacco cultured MP sitting next to him on TV this morning? Way to go Lusk — two out of five on the Q and A couch. FFS

No comments:

Post a Comment