Avalanche! Media Hyperbole On News Corp, The ‘Free’ Press And A ‘Berlin Wall Moment’
http://www.medialens.org/
http://www.medialens.org/
‘The world is changing’, declared the Guardian in a ‘revolutionary
week’. ‘This is our Berlin Wall moment’, tweeted Guardian columnist
George Monbiot. ‘Our democracy is stronger’, proclaimed the
Independent. For BBC political editor Nick Robinson, it was an
‘avalanche’ that was ‘still moving’. ‘Gravity’, he intoned, ‘cannot be
defied for ever.’ Someone at this very moment may well be writing the
script for Avalanche!, the next blockbuster movie from a major
Hollywood studio (but probably not 20th Century Fox.)
week’. ‘This is our Berlin Wall moment’, tweeted Guardian columnist
George Monbiot. ‘Our democracy is stronger’, proclaimed the
Independent. For BBC political editor Nick Robinson, it was an
‘avalanche’ that was ‘still moving’. ‘Gravity’, he intoned, ‘cannot be
defied for ever.’ Someone at this very moment may well be writing the
script for Avalanche!, the next blockbuster movie from a major
Hollywood studio (but probably not 20th Century Fox.)
There’s no doubt that a body blow has been delivered to Rupert
Murdoch’s mighty News Corporation empire. Leading politicians, who
until very recently had been both obsequious and fearful, now want to
put themselves at least a bargepole’s length away from the media
mogul. As Media Lens reader ‘Keith-264’ noted on our message board:
Murdoch’s mighty News Corporation empire. Leading politicians, who
until very recently had been both obsequious and fearful, now want to
put themselves at least a bargepole’s length away from the media
mogul. As Media Lens reader ‘Keith-264’ noted on our message board:
‘Rupert's down and is getting a tabloid handbagging from lots of
people who hitherto hid under a stone at the mere sound of his
name.’ (July 14, 2011)
people who hitherto hid under a stone at the mere sound of his
name.’ (July 14, 2011)
The power of the public is the prime reason for the shift. There had
been near-universal revulsion at the phone hacking involving murdered
children, victims of the 7 July 2005 bombing in London, and the
families of servicemen killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. News
International payments to police officers and pay-offs to phone-
hacking victims, together with feeble and curtailed police
investigations, make up a toxic mix with rumours of even worse to be
exposed in the near future. In this atmosphere of public disgust, the
main political parties had finally shown some mettle and stood up to
Murdoch’s long-time bullying.
been near-universal revulsion at the phone hacking involving murdered
children, victims of the 7 July 2005 bombing in London, and the
families of servicemen killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. News
International payments to police officers and pay-offs to phone-
hacking victims, together with feeble and curtailed police
investigations, make up a toxic mix with rumours of even worse to be
exposed in the near future. In this atmosphere of public disgust, the
main political parties had finally shown some mettle and stood up to
Murdoch’s long-time bullying.
Tory leader David Cameron desperately tried to keep his head above
water, seemingly unable to comprehend the extent of a rapidly
escalating anger throughout an appalled country. He was engulfed by
fallout from his shoddy judgement in employing Andy Coulson, a former
editor of News of the World, as his director of communications.
water, seemingly unable to comprehend the extent of a rapidly
escalating anger throughout an appalled country. He was engulfed by
fallout from his shoddy judgement in employing Andy Coulson, a former
editor of News of the World, as his director of communications.
Spreading around the blame in an attempt to dilute his own
culpability, Cameron stated:
culpability, Cameron stated:
‘The truth is, we have all been in this together—the press,
politicians and leaders of all parties—and yes, that includes me.’
politicians and leaders of all parties—and yes, that includes me.’
There was no sign that he, far less the government, would resign over
the matter.
the matter.
A Guardian team lead by investigative journalist Nick Davies did much
to stoke up the heat on Rupert Murdoch, his son James and Rebekah
Brooks, as well as the Metropolitan Police in London. While
recognising the good journalism undertaken here, the Guardian has not
been entirely convincing about its role in ‘warning’ Cameron about
Coulson’s connections to a private investigator with a criminal
record. As John Hilley asks:
to stoke up the heat on Rupert Murdoch, his son James and Rebekah
Brooks, as well as the Metropolitan Police in London. While
recognising the good journalism undertaken here, the Guardian has not
been entirely convincing about its role in ‘warning’ Cameron about
Coulson’s connections to a private investigator with a criminal
record. As John Hilley asks:
Is it the role of this country's 'leading liberal' newspaper to act as
a 'vetting agent' for top politicians?
a 'vetting agent' for top politicians?
We asked Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger, deputy editor Ian Katz (who
actually placed the phone call to the Tory inner circle) and the
‘unreconstructed idealist’ George Monbiot. Not one of them responded.
It appears that Monbiot is a ‘professional troublemaker’ so long as it
does not entail asking questions of his own corporate employer.
actually placed the phone call to the Tory inner circle) and the
‘unreconstructed idealist’ George Monbiot. Not one of them responded.
It appears that Monbiot is a ‘professional troublemaker’ so long as it
does not entail asking questions of his own corporate employer.
We must also bear in mind that it makes good business sense to put
media competitors under the spotlight; The Times and Sunday Times
are, after all, in the same ‘quality press’ market as the Guardian and
the Observer. Weakening the grip of News International on the UK media
would have many benefits for the other corporate media players. But
the notion that a more honest media would thus emerge, one capable of
systematically challenging official propaganda that facilitates
military ‘interventions’ and abuses of planet and people, is highly
suspect. The same structural constraints ensuring propaganda services
on behalf of elite state-corporate interests remain in place.
media competitors under the spotlight; The Times and Sunday Times
are, after all, in the same ‘quality press’ market as the Guardian and
the Observer. Weakening the grip of News International on the UK media
would have many benefits for the other corporate media players. But
the notion that a more honest media would thus emerge, one capable of
systematically challenging official propaganda that facilitates
military ‘interventions’ and abuses of planet and people, is highly
suspect. The same structural constraints ensuring propaganda services
on behalf of elite state-corporate interests remain in place.
Downplaying or overlooking these constraints, with talk of a
Hippocratic Oath for journalists and a new manifesto for media ethics,
is little more than a fresh lick of paint to a towering press edifice.
Hippocratic Oath for journalists and a new manifesto for media ethics,
is little more than a fresh lick of paint to a towering press edifice.
Freedom of information campaigner Heather Brooke says the ‘root cause’
of ‘the corrupt relationship between the power elites’ is ‘the
secretive system of information patronage.’ Access to public records
in the US is far better protected than here in the UK which still
veers towards secrecy. One might ask then: why is it that journalism
in the US is arguably even more supine to power than it is here in the
UK? In fact, the barriers to genuine fourth-estate journalism are much
more systemic than Brooke recognises, in common with other
commentators now blathering away in the corporate media.
of ‘the corrupt relationship between the power elites’ is ‘the
secretive system of information patronage.’ Access to public records
in the US is far better protected than here in the UK which still
veers towards secrecy. One might ask then: why is it that journalism
in the US is arguably even more supine to power than it is here in the
UK? In fact, the barriers to genuine fourth-estate journalism are much
more systemic than Brooke recognises, in common with other
commentators now blathering away in the corporate media.
Equally oblivious to the structural realities that crush any real
prospects of journalism holding power to account, the Independent
asserted:
prospects of journalism holding power to account, the Independent
asserted:
‘Britain still has a free, independent and ethical press, and it
remains as essential to the nation's wellbeing as ever.’
remains as essential to the nation's wellbeing as ever.’
In his book, Flat Earth News, the Guardian’s Nick Davies had
written:
written:
'Owners and advertisers are only part of the reason for the
ideological problems in the mass media; and ideology is only part of
the total problem of the retreat from truth-telling journalism.
Journalists with whom I have discussed this agree that if you could
quantify it, you could attribute only 5% or 10% of the problem to the
total impact of these two forms of interference.' (p. 22)
ideological problems in the mass media; and ideology is only part of
the total problem of the retreat from truth-telling journalism.
Journalists with whom I have discussed this agree that if you could
quantify it, you could attribute only 5% or 10% of the problem to the
total impact of these two forms of interference.' (p. 22)
The inference was that even Murdoch at most constitutes a 5 to 10%
hindrance in honest journalism: a very modest ‘statistic’ – in fact,
more of a thumb-sucking number - at odds with the hyperbolic wave of
rhetoric and self-congratulation sweeping over the Guardian and the
rest of the liberal media at the sight of Rupert Murdoch apparently
stopped in his tracks. Could this really be the dawn of a new
‘changed’ world of ‘media plurality’, ‘stronger democracy’ and
dismantled Berlin Walls?
hindrance in honest journalism: a very modest ‘statistic’ – in fact,
more of a thumb-sucking number - at odds with the hyperbolic wave of
rhetoric and self-congratulation sweeping over the Guardian and the
rest of the liberal media at the sight of Rupert Murdoch apparently
stopped in his tracks. Could this really be the dawn of a new
‘changed’ world of ‘media plurality’, ‘stronger democracy’ and
dismantled Berlin Walls?
The ‘Wake-up Call’ That Rang For Thirty Years And More
We are to believe that our leaders have suddenly come to their senses
about the collusion between powerful media, corrupt police and the
political establishment. David Cameron declared the current scandal
was a ‘wake-up call’. Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, said:
about the collusion between powerful media, corrupt police and the
political establishment. David Cameron declared the current scandal
was a ‘wake-up call’. Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, said:
‘I think what we've seen, what's come to light over the last week or
two is a symptom if you like of a much wider problem. And that problem
is that different bits of the British system; the press, the police,
the politicians just became too close to one another, became too cosy,
became too tied up with each other.’
two is a symptom if you like of a much wider problem. And that problem
is that different bits of the British system; the press, the police,
the politicians just became too close to one another, became too cosy,
became too tied up with each other.’
Channel 4 News presenter Jon Snow mewled plaintively into the Twitter
sphere:
sphere:
‘We knew it was happening..all of it in a sense, why didn't we do more
about it?’
about it?’
Indeed, why didn’t you? You and your media colleagues had the
resources to uncover it all. You just didn’t have the cojones.
Instead, you shamefully let down the public that pays your salary.
resources to uncover it all. You just didn’t have the cojones.
Instead, you shamefully let down the public that pays your salary.
Somehow this all ‘just’ happened and only hit senior politicians over
the head in ‘the last week or two’. Journalists bemoan the fact they
couldn’t speak out about it before. All of this is deceptive, self-
serving nonsense. The public has seen the reality for years, if not
decades. Why else the widespread scepticism and even deep cynicism
towards politicians and the corporate media?
the head in ‘the last week or two’. Journalists bemoan the fact they
couldn’t speak out about it before. All of this is deceptive, self-
serving nonsense. The public has seen the reality for years, if not
decades. Why else the widespread scepticism and even deep cynicism
towards politicians and the corporate media?
Many people know all too well that we are kept away from meaningful
input to major government policies. Excluded from the ship’s bridge,
we are largely captive passengers on a supertanker that is sailing on
a destructive course set by the convergence of state and corporate
power.
input to major government policies. Excluded from the ship’s bridge,
we are largely captive passengers on a supertanker that is sailing on
a destructive course set by the convergence of state and corporate
power.
Julie Hyland injected some much-needed perspective:
‘What is being exposed is not simply the moral and political depravity
of one man or one corporation, but the putrefaction of an entire
social and political system. Nothing the Labourites or Tories say can
conceal the fact that for more than 30 years Murdoch has been the
power behind the throne of British politics—and indeed, the politics
of countries all over the world. This includes the US, where Murdoch’s
Fox network, New York Post and Wall Street Journal largely set the
reactionary agenda for the two big business parties [i.e. both the
Republicans and the Democrats].’
of one man or one corporation, but the putrefaction of an entire
social and political system. Nothing the Labourites or Tories say can
conceal the fact that for more than 30 years Murdoch has been the
power behind the throne of British politics—and indeed, the politics
of countries all over the world. This includes the US, where Murdoch’s
Fox network, New York Post and Wall Street Journal largely set the
reactionary agenda for the two big business parties [i.e. both the
Republicans and the Democrats].’
Turning back to Britain, Hyland provided further context so glaringly
absent from ‘mainstream’ media coverage:
absent from ‘mainstream’ media coverage:
‘The relationship between the two main parties and Murdoch is based on
a common economic and political agenda—one forged in the early 1980s,
as the ruling class set out to destroy the social rights won by
working people in order to give free rein to the corporations and the
City of London.
a common economic and political agenda—one forged in the early 1980s,
as the ruling class set out to destroy the social rights won by
working people in order to give free rein to the corporations and the
City of London.
‘Murdoch backed Thatcher to launch the anti-working class offensive,
then switched to Tony Blair and Labour to deepen it, and switched back
to the Tories and Cameron to finish the job of destroying the social
gains of a century of working class struggle.’
then switched to Tony Blair and Labour to deepen it, and switched back
to the Tories and Cameron to finish the job of destroying the social
gains of a century of working class struggle.’
Or if you prefer Clegg’s propaganda version of the truth, uncritically
relayed by the Guardian:
relayed by the Guardian:
‘This whole episode has cast a spotlight on that sort of murky world
of the British establishment, the police, the press and politicians
and we must now take this opportunity to clean things up and make sure
that the public once again trust those institutions.’
of the British establishment, the police, the press and politicians
and we must now take this opportunity to clean things up and make sure
that the public once again trust those institutions.’
Just as when Tony Blair’s New Labour swept into Downing Street in
1997, and when the sainted Barack ‘Yes we can!’ Obama ascended to the
US presidency in 2009, it is crucial that the slate is once again
wiped clean, and public confidence in power restored, so that the
establishment can get on with doing pretty much whatever it likes. Or
if we decide that this is unacceptable, as we should, then we can rip
up the endlessly repeating script and rewrite it in our favour.
1997, and when the sainted Barack ‘Yes we can!’ Obama ascended to the
US presidency in 2009, it is crucial that the slate is once again
wiped clean, and public confidence in power restored, so that the
establishment can get on with doing pretty much whatever it likes. Or
if we decide that this is unacceptable, as we should, then we can rip
up the endlessly repeating script and rewrite it in our favour.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The goal of Media Lens is to promote rationality, compassion and
respect for others. If you do write to journalists, we strongly urge
you to maintain a polite, non-aggressive and non-abusive tone.
respect for others. If you do write to journalists, we strongly urge
you to maintain a polite, non-aggressive and non-abusive tone.
Please write to:
Nick Robinson, BBC political editor
Email: nick.r...@bbc.co.uk
Alan Rusbridger, Guardian editor
Email: alan.ru...@guardian.co.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/
Chris Blackhurst, Independent editor
Email: c.blac...@independent.co.uk
Jon Snow, C4 News presenter
Email: jon....@itn.co.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/
Please blind-copy us in on any exchanges or forward them to us later
at:
at:
No comments:
Post a Comment