Wednesday 10 January 2018

Michael Laws utterly unable to defend his extreme comments (Feb. 22, 2012)

me (Morrissey Breen change
2/22/12
If you were so bored and stupid that you listened to Michael Laws this
morning, you may have detected that he was more than a little
distracted. Possibly because at the same time that he was raving about
the need to sterilize "feral Māori", he was engaging in an epistolary
exchange with this writer, i.e., moi....

1.) 9:36 AM
Dear Michael,
Why don't you provide a lead for the Māori "ferals" and have yourself
sterilized?
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey Breen
Northcote Point

2.) Michael Laws mlaws@mediaworks.co.nz
9:50 AM
Because i don't kill my children you wanker!

3.) 10:03 AM
Really? You were, and no doubt still are, a vituperative advocate of
the mass killing of children in Palestine.
Yours in honest disclosure,
Morrissey

4.) Michael Laws mlaws@mediaworks.co.nz
10:07 AM
Do you enjoy living on the sickness benefit with your mental condition
or are you just FITH?

5.) 10:11 AM
Not a clever reply, my friend. No doubt you intimidate lots of people
with personal attacks like that, just like you dismissed poor old
"Walter" before the News.

But back to the point under discussion: how can you pretend to be an
advocate for Maori children when you have such a filthy record of anti-
Palestinian bigotry?

Still waiting for an intelligent answer...
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey

6.) 10:19 AM
Ditto: how do you justify killing Maori kids??

7.) 10:34 AM
I don't. I think it's terrible, but unlike you, I really mean that.
Now when will you condemn the government-sponsored killing of
Palestinian children?

Still waiting....
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey


8.) 10:36 AM
I don't care about kids in another country, you moron, when its the
kids here getting killed? YOU are part of the problem wasting your few
mental resources on mad people half a world away.

9.) 10:42 AM
You "don't care about kids in another country"? Then why did you so
vociferously champion their destruction in January 2009?

Calling murdered children "mad" is not an intelligent answer, so could
you have another, serious, attempt at an explanation?

Still waiting....
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey

10.) 10:43 AM
Actually if the Israelis had taken you out, I'd have cheered too

11.) 10:54 AM
Still not a serious or credible answer, my friend. You're not making
uneasy sycophants laugh in a Dunedin cafetaria now; you're expected to
back up your attitude with some kind of argument. So far you've said
nothing of intelligence.

By the way, I thought it was amusing to hear you assert that you
"don't like people who make up history"; I remember the wandery,
disconnected and confused potted history of Israel you gave on air at
the bloodiest point of the massacre. You obviously got your "history"
from a fantasy source---was it Joan Peters by any chance?
Still waiting, mate....
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey Breen

12.) 10:58 AM
False name false FB profile = fraud

13.) 11:03 AM
Jokes, personal attacks, now threats. You've really gone to the well,
haven't you?

Is a false Facebook profile as bad a crime as uttering?
Yours in amusement,
Morrissey

14.) 11:08 AM
You're just a wanker: anonymous wanker hiding behind false identity.
Sicko.Now fuck off ...


15.) 11:13 AM
Quod erat demonstrandum.

Thanks, mate. Your programme's a winner, and your callers are all as
informed and intelligent as you.

Well done, my friend.

Hilarious.
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey

16.) 11:18 AM
FRAUD

17.) 11:29 AM
"Fraud"? Really? Using a pseudonym on the internet is an accepted and
almost universal practice. It's hardly fraudulent. Forging documents
when you're an elected public figure is fraud.
Yours in amusement,
Morrissey

18.) 11:29 AM
FRAUD

19.) 11:37 AM
Seriously Michael, we try to resist inferring from the way in which
you bawl into the microphone that you're not very bright, but your
tendentious and abusive e-mail correspondence just confirms it.

What will you do if you lose your radio spot?
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey

20.) 11:38 AM
FRAUD

21.) 11:50 AM
Shouting like that doesn't really enhance your credibility, old chap.

It's easy to berate callers, and cut them off when you can't mount a
coherent argument against them, but in epistolary form like this, you
end up just making yourself look kind of .... well, daft.

I do expect better than you've shown this morning---but then again,
I've rarely heard you in better form. Which is a disappointment.
Yours sincerely,
Morrissey

22.) 11:50 AM
FRAUD

23.) 12:03 PM
Dear Alan Partridge,

A convicted utterer accusing someone of fraud.

Kind of awesome.

Yours in amusement,
Morrissey

Click here to Reply
JohnO 
2/22/12
On Feb 22, 12:28 pm, Morrissey Breen <morrisseybr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you were so bored and stupid that you listened to Michael Laws this 
> morning ...

Clearly you were bored and stupid enough, Mowithey. And being
unemployable, you had plenty of time on your hands to engage in a long
winded series of communications with him.

Sucks to be you, Mowithey. 
me (Morrissey Breen change
2/22/12
- show quoted text -
Oh dear, JohnO. I never for a moment expected you to make an honest or
reasonable response. So what kind of chance WAS there of you making a
serious or intelligent response? ...

http://silencedmajority.blogs.com/.a/6a00d834520b4b69e2011168a2b8de970c-400wi 
Radio Transcripts Ltd 
2/22/12
On Feb 22, 1:10 pm, JohnO <johno1...@gmail.com> wrote: 
- show quoted text -
"Long-winded"? Breen set up a trap for that ignorant, foul-mouthed
fool to walk into, and then eviscerated him with formidable precision.
Not a word was wasted.

Could you explain how this demolition job was "long-winded"?

No comments:

Post a Comment