Former M.P. Shane Jones now working as a security guard in San Diego (Dec. 23, 2016)

ACT is the inevitable next stop for this useless waka-jumper.

Has anyone else caught the news about disgraced former M.P. Shane Jones working as a security guard in San Diego? 

http://deadspin.com/security-guard-appears-to-be-masturbating-near-cheerlea-1790317271 

Click here to Reply

nor...@googlegroups.com

12/23/16

- show quoted text -

Morrissey, I already posted that link to the entire planet with you named as
the self-abuser. Come to think of it, I that seems perfectly appropriate!
Tony

12/23/16  Rich80105 On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:21:47 -0800 (PST), morriss...@gmail.com wrote:

12/24/16  george A post from our resident sad sack just makes the season go all that slimier

12/24/16  Pooh You are just being nasty, george - while I understand your distaste, try giving a reason for your opinion rather than just competing for sliminess.

morriss...@gmail.com

12/24/16

On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:38:13 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:21:47 -0800 (PST), morriss...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> >ACT is the inevitable next stop for this useless waka-jumper
> >
> >Has anyone else caught the news about disgraced former M.P. Shane Jones working as a security guard in San Diego?
> >
> >http://deadspin.com/security-guard-appears-to-be-masturbating-near-cheerlea-1790317271
>
> I do feel uncomfortable about this post, and I did wonder if someone
> else was posting under the Morrissey Breen name, but enough of the
> headers appear to match that if the nom has been taken over then it
> was more than a few months ago. Apart from anything else, the slur
> about Shane Jones is uncharitable, clearly untrue,

W-W-W-WHAT?!!??!?!? You seem to be unfamiliar with the waka-jumper's record...

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3796622/Shane-Jones-Minister-of-Pornography

>
> and more typical of
> the sort of shallow posts we see from the defenders of National's more
> sophisticated dirty tricks.


>
> Morrissey, if this is yor post, then please clean your act up -
> politics in New Zealand does not need the distraction of such obvious
> lies, and I doubt many see much humour in it either.

I've taken your advice, Rich, and amended it to fit an more appropriate subject: the Quitter's idiot son Max. 

morriss...@gmail.com

12/24/16

- show quoted text -

"Sad sack"? Ha! I'm not the one still reeling from a landslide by-election beating, followed by your hero's speedy exit just over one day later. 

12/24/16  HitAnyKey ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

12/24/16  Pooh You are possibly unaware of the "Dirty Tricks" exposed in the book by Hager (e.g. see: http://www.nickyhager.info/new-zealand-elections-dirty-tricks-helped-john-key-win-another-term-2/ ) The facts exposed in that book have been consistently

12/24/16  HitAnyKey But your example only works if you can justify Hager's joining of dots (or even the dots themselves) as reliable, and not in the league of those who insist that NASA fabricated the moon landings, or who believe in ancient aliens, or in flying

12/24/16  Pooh So who in this ng has defended Nationals dirty tricks? You Rich have on several occasions defended Labours dirty tricks. But I doubt if that surprises anybody. Or are you just making up shit as only you can do Rich?

12/24/16  Pooh Rich the 'book' was an attack on National by a political activist who has one of the dirtiest records in New Zealand. Your denial that Labour doesn't practice 'dirty politics' is just you ignoring Labours own record of 'dirty politics'.

12/24/16  Pooh Reeling from a 'landslide' bye-election result? FFS you dumb Sad Sack. It was a well known SAFE Labour seat and they could still only get something like 50% of the turnout at the 2014 election. You been getting into the cooking sherry again

12/24/16  Rich80105 On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:50:09 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey

12/25/16  HitAnyKey The basic facts have not been disputed because they can't be. But it's a long way from there to establishing that the actions involved were part of a systematic or orchestrated conspiracy rather than simple, misguided enthusiasm on the part of a

12/25/16  Pooh On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:40:45 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey

12/25/16  HitAnyKey .... which is a highly plausible explanation and will remain so until a case to the contrary emerges that rests upon solid proofs as distinct from a chorus of indignant speculation.

12/25/16  Pooh On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 02:56:34 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey

12/26/16  HitAnyKey An important thing about holding up one end of an argument is consistency. In the remark above you are claiming a respect for the Nats' abilities that simply does not square with your habitual and spiteful whining about them in these discussions.

12/26/16  Pooh On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 20:26:07 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey

12/26/16  Pooh What a load of utter bollocks!

12/26/16  HitAnyKey All I'm saying is that your (and Hager's) attempt to persuade that there was a deliberate high-level orchestrated campaign of dirty politics leaves me and many others unconvinced for two main reasons: 1. The case for connecting some ill-judged

12/26/16  Rich80105 On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 07:25:12 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey

12/27/16  HitAnyKey White knights, eh? Astonishing. And I'd thought it was all down to a bad case of confirmation bias. Silly me! (Google it ...)

12/27/16  nor...@googlegroups.com He provided zero proof. only opinion, Which is as valid as any otrher uninformed commentator.