Thursday, 3 January 2019

Brett Dale concerned about his "grumpy face icon". (Oct. 26, 2013)

      • Why have I got a grumpy face icon, and how do i change it.
        • Morrissey25.1
          If you don’t like it, how about you just stay off this forum?
        • Tat Loo (CV)25.2
          It’s a pain but you can use another email address as your login. A mod will need to approve your post the first time you use your new email.
          However, I’m under the impression that the system is going back to the old gravatars in a couple of days so you could just wait it out.
        • MrSmith25.3
          Typical, image is everything a Brett.
        • lprent25.4
          Because wordpress 3.7 had a wee bug to do with the usual identicon – it wasn’t displaying them, but was displaying an empty head (which is what it still shows at the backend).
          I flipped it to a different type of gravatar at the front end and that worked. After I solved how to set it correctly, I had a whim that said to leave it on the “new” ones for this weekend. sysop’s choice for people using default identicons ðŸ˜ˆ
          The best way to “fix” it is to upload one or more images to gravatar (http://en.gravatar.com ) against your email “address”. From memory, the email address doesn’t even have to be valid for the second and subsequent ones on an account.
          The image you choose can be uploaded from anything. Most people just put a query into google, select image(s), save them to their hard disk and then upload them. Personally I use gimp ( http://www.gimp.org/ ) to make mine unique.
          The image will then show on most wordpress (and blogger? and others?) websites whenever you use that email “address”
          I shunt my image on all my social media including facebook etc
          BTW: I thought that the “grumpy face icon” suited you..
      • karol26
        An unemployed (or possibly about to be unemployed) used car salesman, auditioning for a role on the Shopping Channel. Selling a fish infectif, an upta debt infas chucked ya.
        Sorry. No call back.
        And I thought Shearer had poor delivery. Follow the punctuation, buddy. And don’t stop when the line on the cue card ends… read on to the next line without missing a beat.
        • Lanthanide26.1
          Wow, that’s abysmal.
          He clearly is reading the text for the first time. So lazy!
          • Tat Loo (CV)26.1.1
            Check out the left-to-right shuffling of his eyes as he reads the words. *Groan*.
          • Anne26.1.2
            No, it’s not the first time Lanthanide. He’s been practising his elocution in front of a mirror. You can tell by the emphasis on some of the words. What a dick! I used to talk like that when I was a kid practising my poetry reading in front of a mirror. Fancied myself as being good at it… and I fancied myself.
        • Draco T Bastard26.2
          The ultrafast broadband project is the proof that privatisation of infrastructure doesn’t work. If we hadn’t privatised Telecom we wouldn’t have to be forking billions of taxpayer dollars to get Telecom to what needs to be done because it would have been done already.
          • TheContrarian26.2.1
            We have been over this before Draco – it isn’t proof of anything outside of proof positive of what you think might have happened if what Draco thinks would have happened happened.
      • Anne27
        …what he has shown us over the last few years has exposed him as being ‘emotionally, spiritually and compassionately unintelligent.
        Good comments Vanessa. Of course that is an apt description of most right-wingers. That is why they are right-wingers. They have little to no empathy for people outside their own self serving circles. They are spiritually barren – especially the conservative rump church goers like Colin Craig. Their thinking processes are simplistic and almost philistine in nature. Here’s an example:
        was reading a profile of this Nat MP, Mark Mitchell – the one who leaked the Brown scandal to councillor, Penny Webster and who apparently has close ties to the police, defence force and our intelligence agencies. In his own words “I’m passionate about law and order. I just want to see the bad ones locked up”. That no doubt includes climatological scientists, so-called tree huggers and anyone who is associated with that subversive organisation called Greenpeace. And one of the most primeval of all of them is that monkey the Aussies have just elected as their prime minister. Despite the rapidly increasing size and frequency of the bush fires etc., he still scoffs at and denies the overwhelming evidence of Global Warming/Climate Change.
        These are the real bad ones. The ones who should be locked up and throw away their keys.
        [lprent: shunted to OpenMike as some rich moron thinks that they can read science and has therefore gone quite off topic… ]
        • rich the other27.1
          Anne,
          Do you still seriously believe in global warming ??
          Fact , no temperature increase in the last 15 years , when is it going to start again, 5,15, 50 , 500, or 5million years ????????.
          Wake up , it’s a con which has become political not factual .
          Lucy is a real example of the delusional green brigade.
          You have got to hand it to green peace , they have her fooled and are happy to take advantage of her falling profile, with a bit of luck they will con her into making a protest Russia.
          Throw away the key.
          • lprent27.1.1
            Always nice to meet rich idiots like you who don’t understand statistics… They have the generic name of “suckers” or “marks”.
          • Tat Loo (CV)27.1.2
            NASA scientists say 2012 was the ninth warmest of any year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures. With the exception of 1998, the nine warmest years in the 132-year record all have occurred since 2000, with 2010 and 2005 ranking as the hottest years on record.
            Question for rich the other: are the years 2005 and 2010 (the hottest years on record according to NASA) within “the last 15 years”?
            Supplementary: do you even give a shit, if they are?
            • rich the other27.1.2.1
              Tat loo
              So what you are saying is the 2000 IPCC page report on this con is wrong , the 15 years of NO warming is their figure , the actual truth is 18yrs but we won’t quibble over 3yrs.
              This topic has become highly political because some governments around the world have been completely fooled and their reputations are at stake.
              Lucy might like to make a movie on the topic , perhaps the title should be [ The Greatest Con on Earth ] and may I suggest she asks Joyce for a SUBSIDY which would be funded from tax from workers pay packets.
              • lprent27.1.2.1.1
                Have you looked at the summary figures for ocean warming?
                Actually – strike that. We know that you are merely repeating some other moron and haven’t bothered to read the report.
                Perhaps you could tell us what the IPCC found for heat storage in the oceans over the last 15 years? Possibly what the heat storage capacity of salt water is compared to seal level air? In fact demonstrate ANY ability to read and understand the IPCC report section one?
                You really are a wanker too incapable of doing your own work. You just echo the strokes for some other fool.
                silly puppet..
              • Tat Loo (CV)27.1.2.1.2
                So what you are saying is the 2000 IPCC page report on this con is wrong , the 15 years of NO warming is their figure
                NASA does the business, my man. Remote sensing is what they do. One good thing about having an active superpower in the world. So let’s run the quote again- with just one exception, the 9 warmest years in the 132 year record have happened since 2000.
                Seems pretty definitive to me.
        • Rogue Trooper27.2
          Beautiful prose Anne

No comments:

Post a Comment