10 March 2004
Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
Listeners to Newstalk ZB will know that every weekday morning at 6:25
a.m., breakfast host Paul Holmes has a chat about sports with the oily
sports "journalist"Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy. Actually, "chat" is
hardly the word for it; perhaps "ritual slaughter" is a better
description for the way Holmes runs verbal rings around the
slow-witted, ponderous Saveloy.
a.m., breakfast host Paul Holmes has a chat about sports with the oily
sports "journalist"Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy. Actually, "chat" is
hardly the word for it; perhaps "ritual slaughter" is a better
description for the way Holmes runs verbal rings around the
slow-witted, ponderous Saveloy.
This morning, however, Holmes goes easy on his pinguid punching-bag.
You see, Holmes is feeling all warm and positive about his TV item,
the previous night, on the New Zealand cricket team. He can't say
enough about the men in white....
You see, Holmes is feeling all warm and positive about his TV item,
the previous night, on the New Zealand cricket team. He can't say
enough about the men in white....
HOLMES: After all the PRECIOUSNESS associated with rugby players last
year, it's nice to be associated with intelligent people who can hold
a NORMAL conversation.
year, it's nice to be associated with intelligent people who can hold
a NORMAL conversation.
SAVELOY: Don't start me on THAT! After being asked to move from
Blues training at Eden Park yesterday. Errrrrrmmmm....
Blues training at Eden Park yesterday. Errrrrrmmmm....
HOLMES: Hey, tell me about it!
SAVELOY: [stoically] Well, errrrrmmmmm, it's their prerogative....
..............................
BREEN COMMENTS: Three cheers for the Blues! If only more New Zealand
football teams put their foot down and stopped the likes of Saveloy
having any access, we would get some decent coverage of the game. The
fat creep has also been known to haunt the Chiefs' dressing rooms; one
wonders how long it will be before THAT organisation gets its act
together and bans him.
football teams put their foot down and stopped the likes of Saveloy
having any access, we would get some decent coverage of the game. The
fat creep has also been known to haunt the Chiefs' dressing rooms; one
wonders how long it will be before THAT organisation gets its act
together and bans him.
Saveloy's "errrrrrmmmm" count this morning: 14
Click here to Reply
 |
"Morrissey Breen" <morriss...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fb3a0456.0403100208.
> 10 March 2004
> Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
>
> Listeners to Newstalk ZB will know that every weekday morning at 6:25
> a.m., breakfast host Paul Holmes has a chat about sports with the oily
> sports "journalist"Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy. Actually, "chat" is
> hardly the word for it; perhaps "ritual slaughter" is a better
> description for the way Holmes runs verbal rings around the
> slow-witted, ponderous Saveloy.
>
> This morning, however, Holmes goes easy on his pinguid punching-bag.
He's right you know, it is a word....
http://www.bartleby.com/61/43/
http://www.bartleby.com/61/43/
Two oily's.....how oily is that? And he's in a dressing room?
|
I used to work with both of them and I agree that both are twats. Paul is
incredibly smart but knows nothing about sport. Whilst Sav isn't smart and
knows nothing about sport.
incredibly smart but knows nothing about sport. Whilst Sav isn't smart and
knows nothing about sport.
Should stick to commentating NZ womens tennis tournaments. It's his level.
"didgerman" <aw99...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:o_B3c.3596$1h7.24250@
news:o_B3c.3596$1h7.24250@
- show quoted text -
|
Morrissey Breen wrote:
>
..............................
..............................
The
> fat creep has also been known to haunt the Chiefs' dressing rooms; one
> wonders how long it will be before THAT organisation gets its act
> together and bans him.
You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.It seems the
greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat.Did a fat person bash
you or something, or just sit on your face?
BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.Do you
think over-weight people have less brains or something?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.618 / Virus Database: 397 - Release Date: 10/03/04
>
..............................
..............................
The
> fat creep has also been known to haunt the Chiefs' dressing rooms; one
> wonders how long it will be before THAT organisation gets its act
> together and bans him.
You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.It seems the
greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat.Did a fat person bash
you or something, or just sit on your face?
BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.Do you
think over-weight people have less brains or something?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.618 / Virus Database: 397 - Release Date: 10/03/04
|
Tilly wrote:
>
> You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.It seems the
> greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat.Did a fat person bash
> you or something, or just sit on your face?
> BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.Do you
> think over-weight people have less brains or something?
>
> You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.It seems the
> greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat.Did a fat person bash
> you or something, or just sit on your face?
> BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.Do you
> think over-weight people have less brains or something?
It pains me that I might be remotely in agreement with Mowwissey, but I
do think that fat people are lazy. I'm not a fan of them. The fuckers
take up too much room. They place an enormous demand on our health
system, money better saved by giving me a tax cut.
do think that fat people are lazy. I'm not a fan of them. The fuckers
take up too much room. They place an enormous demand on our health
system, money better saved by giving me a tax cut.
|
On 10 Mar 2004 02:08:31 -0800, morriss...@yahoo.com (Morrissey
Breen) wrote:
Breen) wrote:
>10 March 2004
>Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
>Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
Blah blah blah blah.
This is the place where I give other posters advice about just
ignoring completely unreadable twats.
ignoring completely unreadable twats.
Call me naively optimistic, but maybe one day he'll get the message
and save us all the trouble of even ignoring him.
and save us all the trouble of even ignoring him.
Naaaahhh!
-- rick boyd
|
"Tilly" <Brig...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<aOC3c.582$rw6....@
>
> You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.
> You seem to have a hatred of over-weight people Mowissey.
Wrong. I do not automatically hate a fat person. He has to earn it.
>
> It seems the greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat. Did a fat person bash
> you or something,
> It seems the greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat. Did a fat person bash
> you or something,
Yes.
>
> or just sit on your face?
> or just sit on your face?
Yes, that too.
>
> BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.
> BTW I am not fat, yet I notice your fat bashing remarks all the time.
Your perception of this writer (moi) as a "fat basher" is flawed. An
extended Google search on my name shows that, in over a year of
posting, I have used the word "fat" a total of 38 times. Hardly
qualifies as "fat bashing remarks all the time".
extended Google search on my name shows that, in over a year of
posting, I have used the word "fat" a total of 38 times. Hardly
qualifies as "fat bashing remarks all the time".
Look carefully now. The only people for whom I have used the word
"fat" pejoratively are as follows....
"fat" pejoratively are as follows....
1.) Bernard Manning....undeniably fat, disgusting racist "comedian".
2.) Tony Blankley.... appallingly fat Washington Times columnist.
Extreme right winger, pathological hater of Arabs, chickenhawk. Could
serve as a double for Bernard Manning.
Extreme right winger, pathological hater of Arabs, chickenhawk. Could
serve as a double for Bernard Manning.
3.) Rush Limbaugh..... undeniably overweight, extreme right wing
radio host, drug freak and chickenhawk. Could fill in for Blankley or
Manning, if he ever learned to speak with a vulgar, low class Limey
accent.
radio host, drug freak and chickenhawk. Could fill in for Blankley or
Manning, if he ever learned to speak with a vulgar, low class Limey
accent.
4.) Phil (Phat Man) Gifford.... bearded, undeniably fat buffoon.
Another Radio Sport affront to New Zealand sports fans.
Another Radio Sport affront to New Zealand sports fans.
5.) Andrew (Slobber) Saveloy.... sleek, overweight, idiotic sports
commentator and, shamefully, a fall-guy for Paul Holmes.
commentator and, shamefully, a fall-guy for Paul Holmes.
6.) Redbaiter.... appallingly overweight, overwrought nz.general
personality and chickenhawk.
personality and chickenhawk.
And that's it! I detest some of the above people, but their fatness
is merely incidental.
is merely incidental.
See for yourself..... http://tinyurl.com/2yjry
>
> Do you think over-weight people have less brains or something?
> Do you think over-weight people have less brains or something?
No.
|
bo...@comswest.net.au (rick boyd) wrote in message news:<404f0c99...@news.
>
> -- rick boyd
>
> This is the place where I give other posters advice about just
> ignoring completely unreadable twats.
> This is the place where I give other posters advice about just
> ignoring completely unreadable twats.
Oh good Lord, Rick. Concentrate, will you? Saveloy is a RADIO
broadcaster. He's unlistenable. How can he be "unreadable"? Do pay
attention, old man.
broadcaster. He's unlistenable. How can he be "unreadable"? Do pay
attention, old man.
>
> Call me naively optimistic, but maybe one day he'll get the message
> and save us all the trouble of even ignoring him.
> Call me naively optimistic, but maybe one day he'll get the message
> and save us all the trouble of even ignoring him.
Count yourself lucky, Rick. You live in Western Australia, far from
the reach of the fat idiot and his Radio Sport colleagues, who are
nearly all just as dire.
the reach of the fat idiot and his Radio Sport colleagues, who are
nearly all just as dire.
>
> Naaaahhh!
> Naaaahhh!
Yes. Yes, he WILL, Rick! If we keep complainining about him and
criticising him in fora like this one, he will eventually be fired.
Join us, Rick, and let the fat bastard - sorry Tilly! - know you are
fed up with substandard sports journos. Simply e-mail this
address....
sp...@radiosport.co.nz
criticising him in fora like this one, he will eventually be fired.
Join us, Rick, and let the fat bastard - sorry Tilly! - know you are
fed up with substandard sports journos. Simply e-mail this
address....
sp...@radiosport.co.nz
>
> -- rick boyd
|
On 10 Mar 2004 02:08:31 -0800, morriss...@yahoo.com (Morrissey
Breen) wrote:
Breen) wrote:
>10 March 2004
>Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
>
>Listeners to Newstalk ZB will know that every weekday morning at 6:25
>a.m., breakfast host Paul Holmes has a chat about sports with the oily
>sports "journalist"Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy.
>Newstalk ZB, The Paul Holmes Breakfast.
>
>Listeners to Newstalk ZB will know that every weekday morning at 6:25
>a.m., breakfast host Paul Holmes has a chat about sports with the oily
>sports "journalist"Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy.
Is that his real name?
Nik
|
Morrissey Breen wrote:
You can be just as far from their reach if you learn to turn the radio
off.
>
>
> Count yourself lucky, Rick. You live in Western Australia, far from
> the reach of the fat idiot and his Radio Sport colleagues,
>
> Count yourself lucky, Rick. You live in Western Australia, far from
> the reach of the fat idiot and his Radio Sport colleagues,
You can be just as far from their reach if you learn to turn the radio
off.
Get an adult to show you how.
Later,
Sean
Sean
|
"Morrissey Breen" <morriss...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > It seems the greatest insult you can inflict is to call someone fat.
Did a fat person bash
> > you or something,
> Yes.
Is that a "shrink' conversation ? Looks like....
> > or just sit on your face?
> Yes, that too.
How old were you... ?
Doctor Do...
|
Mr Breen
Mainstream journalism is crap and has been ever since people decided
that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
I could accept your whinging if you were going to do something about
journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something) but if you're
just going to whinge then you're just contributing to the noise.
journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something) but if you're
just going to whinge then you're just contributing to the noise.
Peter.
|
"Peter Ashford" <m...@here.there.com> wrote in message
news:xQ44c.2014$rw6.52222@
- show quoted text -
He did give out a mail addy for us all to complain to. I certainly did:
'seek out Mr Scebe and employ him' said I. That should see Saveloy
finished.......
'seek out Mr Scebe and employ him' said I. That should see Saveloy
finished.......
|
Peter Ashford wrote:
>
> Peter.
- show quoted text -
Not only that, but by listening he's contributing to their ratings...
Later,
Sean
Sean
>
> Peter.
|
"Donnie" <bla...@blabla.com> wrote in message news:<c2qc08$6bb$1...@news-
>
> Is that a "shrink' conversation ? Looks like....
>
> > > or just sit on your face?
>
> > Yes, that too.
>
> How old were you... ?
> Is that a "shrink' conversation ? Looks like....
>
> > > or just sit on your face?
>
> > Yes, that too.
>
> How old were you... ?
The first time? Eight.
|
Sean Byrne <byrne_sean...@hotmail.
> Peter As=
> Peter As=
|
Peter Ashford <m...@here.there.com> upbraide this writer (moi) in
message news:<xQ44c.2014$rw6....@
>
> Mr Breen
>
> Mainstream journalism is crap and has been ever since people decided
> that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
> present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
> understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
>
> I could accept your whinging
message news:<xQ44c.2014$rw6....@
>
> Mr Breen
>
> Mainstream journalism is crap and has been ever since people decided
> that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
> present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
> understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
I understand your objection. However, unless you have been in this
country over the last five or six years, you really will not have any
appreciation of just how dire our sports journalists are. Of course,
dismal, gullible, uninformed journalists are a plague everywhere. But
I am not aware of any journalists anywhere else writing, and saying,
the kind of crap that New Zealand rugby "journalists" do as a matter
of routine.
country over the last five or six years, you really will not have any
appreciation of just how dire our sports journalists are. Of course,
dismal, gullible, uninformed journalists are a plague everywhere. But
I am not aware of any journalists anywhere else writing, and saying,
the kind of crap that New Zealand rugby "journalists" do as a matter
of routine.
Here, see for yourself....
"AN EDUCATED LOT": A breakfast with Radio Sport
http://tinyurl.com/2xwcq
http://tinyurl.com/2xwcq
Andrew Saveloy: New Zealand's worst sports commentator?
http://tinyurl.com/24lz5
http://tinyurl.com/24lz5
Daisycutter Sports WORLD CUP SPECIAL (Vol.1)
http://tinyurl.com/33pf4
http://tinyurl.com/33pf4
O'Neill's Spaniel back at work
http://tinyurl.com/23y48
http://tinyurl.com/23y48
NZ Herald "Myth of Jonah" article - critiqued by Morrissey Breen
http://tinyurl.com/3arll
http://tinyurl.com/3arll
Why do Martin Devlin and Phil Gifford hate each other so much?
http://tinyurl.com/39xfn
http://tinyurl.com/39xfn
>
> I could accept your whinging
I reject your terminology. My criticism of these fools is consistent
and backed up by rafts of evidence. Most people in this country do
indeed merely whinge about the standard of rugby reporting; I
carefully analyse just WHY it is so dismal. I will not have you
writing off my serious criticisms as "whinging".
and backed up by rafts of evidence. Most people in this country do
indeed merely whinge about the standard of rugby reporting; I
carefully analyse just WHY it is so dismal. I will not have you
writing off my serious criticisms as "whinging".
>
> if you were going to do something about
> journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something)
> if you were going to do something about
> journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something)
You ARE joking, aren't you?
>
> but if you're just going to whinge then you're just contributing to the noise.
> but if you're just going to whinge then you're just contributing to the noise.
Nonsense.
|
"Morrissey Breen" <morriss...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
- show quoted text -
Only three years ago? Memory still fresh then?
--
Regards
Regards
Steve
|
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:48:01 +0000, Sean Byrne wrote
(in message <c2sm7o$fgn$1$8300...@news.
(in message <c2sm7o$fgn$1$8300...@news.
- show quoted text -
And you think any radio station is going to include Breen as a "listener" for
their ratings? I suggest they'd rather have one fewer listener than admit to
that.
their ratings? I suggest they'd rather have one fewer listener than admit to
that.
Andy
|
> > > How old were you... ?
> >
> > The first time? Eight.
> >
> > The first time? Eight.
Okokokokok... Where did it happen ? ... Why and with whom... Context
please...
please...
Doctor Do...
|
"Morrissey Breen" <morriss...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
- show quoted text -
Not *that* first time Breen.....
|
Our friend Andy Mulhearn <unxm...@netcomuk.co.uk> surmises in message
news:<0001HW.
news:<0001HW.
>
> And you think any radio station is going to include Breen as a "listener" for
> their ratings? I suggest they'd rather have one fewer listener than admit to
> that.
> And you think any radio station is going to include Breen as a "listener" for
> their ratings? I suggest they'd rather have one fewer listener than admit to
> that.
Interestingly enough, this writer (i.e., moi) has indeed attracted the
fleeting attention of one of New Zealand's outstanding broadcasters,
viz. one Leighton Smith. You can read all about the encounter by
clicking HERE....
http://tinyurl.com/34j8z
fleeting attention of one of New Zealand's outstanding broadcasters,
viz. one Leighton Smith. You can read all about the encounter by
clicking HERE....
http://tinyurl.com/34j8z
|
Wild Colonial Boy <someth...@iconz.co.nz> wrote in message news:<d9b0501ga72raavdoapuf3sj
> >
> > Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy.
>
> Is that his real name?
>
> Nik
> > Andrew ("Slobber") Saveloy.
>
> Is that his real name?
>
> Nik
Yes it is. Althought I notice that, no doubt at the behest of his
unfortunate family, he has changed it to Andrew Saville.
unfortunate family, he has changed it to Andrew Saville.
|
Morrissey Breen wrote:
> Peter Ashford <m...@here.there.com> upbraide this writer (moi) in
> message news:<xQ44c.2014$rw6....@
>
>>Mr Breen
>>
>>Mainstream journalism is crap and has been ever since people decided
>>that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
>>present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
>>understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
>
>
> I understand your objection. However, unless you have been in this
> country over the last five or six years,
> Peter Ashford <m...@here.there.com> upbraide this writer (moi) in
> message news:<xQ44c.2014$rw6....@
>
>>Mr Breen
>>
>>Mainstream journalism is crap and has been ever since people decided
>>that selling sensational stories was more important than attempting to
>>present the facts in a balanced manner. Most of us regretfully
>>understand this and ignore it. Why can't you?
>
>
> I understand your objection. However, unless you have been in this
> country over the last five or six years,
Well, given that I was born here... yes I suspect I qualify.
you really will not have any
> appreciation of just how dire our sports journalists are.
> appreciation of just how dire our sports journalists are.
I do.
Of course,
> dismal, gullible, uninformed journalists are a plague everywhere. But
> I am not aware of any journalists anywhere else writing, and saying,
> the kind of crap that New Zealand rugby "journalists" do as a matter
> of routine.
>
> dismal, gullible, uninformed journalists are a plague everywhere. But
> I am not aware of any journalists anywhere else writing, and saying,
> the kind of crap that New Zealand rugby "journalists" do as a matter
> of routine.
>
I'm aware of the dross.
>
>>I could accept your whinging
>
>
> I reject your terminology. My criticism of these fools is consistent
> and backed up by rafts of evidence. Most people in this country do
> indeed merely whinge about the standard of rugby reporting; I
> carefully analyse just WHY it is so dismal. I will not have you
> writing off my serious criticisms as "whinging".
>>I could accept your whinging
>
>
> I reject your terminology. My criticism of these fools is consistent
> and backed up by rafts of evidence. Most people in this country do
> indeed merely whinge about the standard of rugby reporting; I
> carefully analyse just WHY it is so dismal. I will not have you
> writing off my serious criticisms as "whinging".
Is that a pout I see? :o)
OK, fair enough - "whinging" is harsh. I'm annoyed. You going on about
NZ broadcasters is annoying me (and others, if responses to your posts
are anything to go by) as much as you appear to be annoyed by the
journalists.
NZ broadcasters is annoying me (and others, if responses to your posts
are anything to go by) as much as you appear to be annoyed by the
journalists.
You are suffering. Need we suffer also?
>
>>if you were going to do something about
>>journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something)
>
>
> You ARE joking, aren't you?
>>if you were going to do something about
>>journalistic integrity (go start a petition or something)
>
>
> You ARE joking, aren't you?
In what way do you think posting your criticisms of NZ journalism to
RSRU is helping then? If anything, writing to TVNZ or the various news
papers might seem... actually constructive. By posting here, at best
your preaching to the choir, at worst you're being repetitive and dull.
RSRU is helping then? If anything, writing to TVNZ or the various news
papers might seem... actually constructive. By posting here, at best
your preaching to the choir, at worst you're being repetitive and dull.
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment