Monday 13 April 2020

Peter Williams amused by “Duterte Harry” and his extrajudicial killings (Dec. 17, 2016)




            • Peter Williams evidently finds “Duterte Harry” and
              his extrajudicial killings to be highly amusing
              In a chirpy and amused tone, veteran autocue reader Peter Williams reads out the following teaser for tonight’s News:
              “The new Philippines president personally confirms that he PERSONALLY KILLED three people in his war on drugs!”
              Advertisement for 6 o’clock News, TV1, 5:39 p.m., repeated at 5:47 p.m.
                                                                                                                                                  Peter Williams, like his vacant-eyed colleagues, has never impressed me as someone who either knows much or thinks much about international politics. But he does know enough to realise that President Duterte of the Philippines is an official ally, and therefore even something as depraved as his killing of unarmed captives can be recounted in a chirpy and amused tone.
              It’s not hard to imagine the lugubrious countenance Williams would strike, and the tone of grim admonition he would adopt if ever an official enemy, rather than an “ally” like Duterte, boasted of killing unarmed captives.
              There have been many killings lately, the officer jokes, that these days you can easily get away with any kind of murder: “You can kill him, put masking tape on him and everybody is going to think that guy is a drug pusher.”
              UPDATE!
              These were the first words Williams intoned at 6 p.m….
              Cut it Out! What President Obama said to Vladimir Putin today about Russian cyber attacks.”


            •                                                              

            • Ad16
              My little ideas for the big Cabinet announcement tomorrow:
              1. Prime Minister Bill English: SIS, Tourism
              2. Paula Bennett: Housing, Auckland Issues, Associate Finance
              3. Stephen Joyce: Finance
              4. Simon Bridges: Economic Development, and Transport
              5. Nikki Kaye: Social Development, Education
              6. Todd McClay: Trade, Foreign Affairs
              7. Michael Woodhouse: Health
              8. Chris Finlayson: Attorney-General, Treaty Negotations, and Arts+Culture
              9. Judith Collins: Defence, Police
              10. Dr Jian Yang: Minister of Tertiary Education, Associate Minister Foreign Affairs
              11. Andrew Bayly: Ministry for Primary Industries (Forestry, Fisheries, Agriculture)
              12. Gerry Brownlee: Chief Whip, Earthquake Recovery
              13. Joanthan Coleman: Justice
              14. Scott Simpson: Revenue
              15. Alfred Ngaro: Corrections, Pacific island Affairs
              16. Nick Smith: Conservation, Environment
              17. Jamie-Lee Ross: Local Government
              • Cinny16.1
                interesting Ad, is Nikki well enough to handle two big portfolio’s ? Please not Nick in environment/conservation. And Coleman doing Justice instead of Health, fascinating.
                You reckon Tolley is a goner? Wonder whom will announce resignation for family reasons tomorrow, haven’t had any quitters for two whole days now lololz.
                Do you know what time the announcement is tomorrow please? I’m curious as to the outgoing PM’s picks for the outgoing government.
                • Ad16.1.1
                  Radio NZ are coving it from 3, with commentary thereafter.
                  I think Kaye is well on the mend, but if she wants to beg off, fine; I was thinking like a PM trying to keep the social investment framework integrated and accelerating. Those were the two portfolios to do it.
                  • Cinny16.1.1.1
                    Thanks mate, will tune in, looking forward to reading yours and others thoughts on here afterwards.
            • Joy FL17
              Political discussion at tonight’s dinner table was about Ruth Dyson being the next to leave, following closely Annette King’s latest announcement.
              • Rosemary McDonald17.1
                Strewth, not Ruth! And Annette!
                My dream is to sit down for an hour with the pair of them and have a free and honest discussion about why they didn’t sort the Family Carers issue before it went to the Tribunal in 2008.
                They had all the facts and research at their fingertips, and chose to throw us to the National wolves.
                Thanks, ladies. Your angry ranting in the House on the 17th May 2013 was nothing but crocodile tears.
                • Chris17.1.1
                  Labour took exactly the same stance towards the carers sleepover case that started around the same time. They could’ve fixed it there and then but Labour let the unions and the providers scrap it out for years before the workers got what ended up being a pretty watered down form of justice.
                  Dyson tried to claim quite a bit of the glory from a number small wins in the disability sector that she in fact had fuck all to do with. She’s definitely another who needs to sling their hook.
                  • Rosemary McDonald17.1.1.1
                    “…carers sleepover case…”
                    Hah! What had me yelling at the radio during the sleepover case was that the very simplest of solutions would have been to do what ACC was doing at the time….a tax free allowance of about $80 -90 per night for non active sleepovers…instead of the pathetic $30 odd that IHC was paying under Miserly of Health. I understand that there is an hourly rate for both now.
                    • Chris17.1.1.1.1
                      Labour could’ve fixed it by renegotiating the contracts based on the true cost of wages. Instead they washed their hands saying it was an “employment” problem. Then when the workers were successful at the Employment Court Labour MPs started cheering “we won!” The whole thing was sickening to watch, including IHC as well, how as an employer they then took on the workers when they themselves argue for proper wages for care workers. It was a perfect opportunity for IHC to join with the workers to lobby government over the inadequate contracts. IHC’s position on that issue showed their true colours, consistent with how they’re colluding with the government to end state involvement in housing. IHC is evil to the core.

No comments:

Post a Comment