Tuesday, 9 July 2019

Bill Ralston’s wife has a go at him on air (Mar. 22, 2013)

  1. Morrissey3
    “He is ARROGANT, he is MOODY, he is CONTROLLING”
    Bill Ralston’s wife has a go at him on air

    “The Huddle”, NewstalkZB, Thursday 21 March 2013, 5:45 p.m.
    Larry “Lackwit” Williams, Pam Corkery, Janet Wilson
    Anyone who tuned into the usually dire “Huddle” segment yesterday would have heard something remarkable: Bill Ralston’s ghastly wife Janet Wilson took the opportunity to tell the world just what she thought of her husband Bill. However, she wasn’t so unwise as to do it directly; she chose the time-honored technique, widely used in Soviet Russia and other repressive regimes, of allegory….
    LARRY “LACKWIT” WILLIAMS: Okay, ahhhhhhhhhmmm. Julia Gillard. She’s GONE for sure!
    PAM CORKERY: Actually, I don’t think so. Kevin Rudd is extremely unpopular. I predict Gillard will win this leadership vote.
    JANET WILSON: I agree with Pam. I’ve never understood the fascination of the Australian public with Kevin Rudd. [voice thickening to a croak as she becomes emotional] He isarrogant, he is moody, he is controlling.
    [Several uneasy seconds of stunned silence follow…]
    LACKWIT WILLIAMS: Okay, ummmm… errrr….
    By the end of that little contribution, Janet Wilson was snarling, and I’m sure she was shaking with emotion too.
    POINT TO PONDER
    When Pam Corkery appears on this show, the quality improves noticeably. That’s because Corkery, one of the few liberal commentators allowed on, will not be bullied and shut out by Lackwit-Williams and whoever happens to be the other Huddle guest. She insists on making her points clearly and will not allow Lackwit-Williams to laugh her into silence. Today, after her coded attack on her husband, Janet Wilson spoke sensibly and thoughtfully, something she is just not usually compelled to do on this normally pisspoor program.
    • bad123.1
      ???Hah, you have to have a very ‘free thinking’ imagination to make the leap from the Australian politics being discussed in the part of the transcript that you have put up to entertain the belief that Ralston’s wife is talking about Him and not the Australian politicians being discussed,
      Perhaps i am missing something here, are there special code words that indicate we should beleive She is talking of Her husband and not Kevin Rudd…
      • felix3.1.1
        Yeah well you also have to have a fairly free-thinking imagination to call it a transcript as Morrissey is known to have quite a different definition of the word to everyone else on the planet.
        • bad123.1.1.1
          Lolz, my bad, it’s my new image, i should have said WTF is that s**t, but, i am trying to do nice lolz,

          Yeah border-line slander seems to be that ones writing style, OK when applied to politicians but i don’t know about radio commenters…
          • Professor Longhair3.1.1.1.1
            1.) …. border-line slander seems to be that ones writing style…
            What, pray tell, was slanderous in suggesting that an angry and emotionally fraught woman was taking the opportunity to publicly excoriate her obnoxious spouse? Of course, she was smart enough to phrase it so that it seemed like a criticism of an obnoxious Australian politician; but smart listeners—and admittedly there are not many of them in that station’s audience—-will have appreciated what she REALLY meant.
            1.) >OK when applied to politicians but i don’t know about radio commenters…
            Oh yes, we need to remember that the afternoon chatterboxes on NewstalkZB are dignified, professional and rigorously dedicated to telling the truth.
            • bad123.1.1.1.1.1
              Nah what i do remember is Lange versus What’s His Face where the judge set out the difference between what could be slander against a politician and a ‘normal’ person, the latter having far more protection under the law than the former,
              i cannot be bothered to expend the energy necessary to address the other part of your comment, except to say that it is as absurd as the original suggestion that the commenter on the radio station was addressing Her husband and not commenting on Kevin Rudd,and, you must have ‘special powers’ to be able to deduce from the comment made the inference later attributed to what was commented upon as the reason to come to that particular conclusion…
        • The Al1en3.1.1.2
          Talking of conspiracy theories…

          I went to pay my website bill after getting the final notice, only to find my payment was bounced back. When I contacted the sales team, they told me I could now no longer pay by bank transfer, as I agreed when I opened the account, because of the unforeseen death of the director.
          So I asked what happens next? Do I just transfer to another place that wants my money? And within a minute I had a transfer key and a goodbye.
          Maybe they just don’t want to make money. Maybe they just don’t want my site on their servers.
          Site down (not that anyone visits) ’til I sort it.
  2. Polish Pride4
    I was going to post this also but you beat me to it :)..
    A perfect example for those who say – if you don’t like the system, don’t participate in it. Go and live in the bush or something. To do this is damn near impossible. The system is so pervasive that even when one chooses to this is what inevitably happens
    -In short You cannot be free of the system even if you want to.
    Have a mind to drive up there and build another makeshift beach bach 30 meters down the beach after the council have gone and give it to him to live in and then keep doing it each time he is evicted!
  3. logie975
    Just where do these captains of industry get off?
    One day the masses are going to wake up to the fact that these inflated egos are going to have to stop being able to nominate their worth to an organisation and be paid just a reasonable living wage.
    Telecom have had a succession of leaders who have been paid multi-million annual salaries, after a few years have moved on with massive golden handshakes and then, suddenly, these organisations announce massive layoffs of the ordinary employees … (saying they have to trim the fat).
    These same captains of industry of course join such organisations as the EMA, Round Table etc and dictate to the government what they think nurses, teachers, firemen etc are worth.
  4. bad126
    Yay, the edit function is back and working, thank you very much i can now return to bad spelling and mangled English with the ability to amend such…
    • Draco T Bastard6.1
      Testing (no HTML)
      Testing (Italics using the editor button)
      <i>Testing</i> (Italics using HTML)
      This is a link (Link inserted using the editor function)

      And, no, I don’t have the WYSIWYG turned on. At least it has an escapse to HTML.
  5. bad127
    So Bill from Dipton, the Minister of Finance is ‘surprised’ by having nearly 10% of Kiwi’s sign up for the preregistration of the legislated theft of Mighty River Power from the other 90% of Kiwi’s,
    This 10% only too happy to be availed the chance to steal off of the other 90% of us are to be given what, 10% of the shares, 20% of the shares???,
    The other 80-90% of the shares will go where, from what Bill says they will be ‘retailed’ on the open market so presumably the ‘mums and dads’ who are the likes of the Goldman Saches US Banking Cartel will swallow the majority of the shares in Mighty River Power,
    Bill’s surprise, sounds like He has promised the ‘banking cartels’ that less than 10% of Kiwis will have the coin to buy into Mighty River so there would be no problem for them through their various Nominee Companies to gain the lions share of the float…

No comments:

Post a Comment