Incredibly, there are still Hillary-worshippers on The Standard (Apr. 27, 2019)

2. Andre8

   27 April 2019 at 11:53 am

   How to walk the fine line of thoroughly examining a candidate's background, suitability and vulnerabilities without setting them up for smear attacks …

   https://www.salon.com/2019/04/26/can-democrats-vet-the-presidential-candidates-without-doing-donald-trumps-dirty-work/

   All that said, of course it would be better if people could focus their criticism on actual behavior rather than leaning heavily on meaningless insults, like “neoliberal” or “corporate shill.” So much of what tanked Hillary Clinton in 2016 was not legitimate criticisms of her actual flaws, especially as she went to great lengths to address those criticisms. It was that she was being demonized with ugly labels that she didn’t deserve. Flaws can be overcome. But if someone is redefined as somehow fundamentally evil in a voter’s eyes, there’s little that can be done to fix that.

   Reply
   • Macro8.1

     27 April 2019 at 1:24 pm

     

     
     

     Reply
   • Morrissey8.2

     27 April 2019 at 1:32 pm

     demonized with ugly labels that she didn’t deserve.

     She deserved to be called a racist….

     …and it's hard to describe her depravity in this clip…

     
     

     Click to Edit – 2 minutes and 48 seconds

     Reply
     • Morrissey8.2.1

       27 April 2019 at 1:34 pm

       And she's a shameless liar, as the scandal over Benghazi, amongst many others, confirmed….

       Click to Edit – 5 minutes and 23 seconds

       Reply
3. 
4.