Absolutely it’s a priority, marty. I was talking to a minister about homelessness and they made the point that its a health issue, not just about housing. And others have talked about the links between suicide, depression and violence and mental health. This party cares.
- Good one – so good you get to talk to the ministers – feel a wee bit envious tbh – but pleased it’s you talking to them.
- Anything about social welfare? Raising basic benefit rates?
- Every blue moon. like clockwork.
- They’re required by statute to raise benefits according to the CPI. I was referring to raising basic benefits so that people weren’t expected to be forced into debt, either to Work and Income or loan sharks or whomever, just to get by. Wonder what the odds are of that coming up in the “policy” section.
- Raising basic benefits would also be of benefit to mental health. See my post at 25.1.1.4.
- There is one policy proposal that directly affects beneficiaries and that’s to lift the earning threshold and to lower the abatement. This would allow beneficiaries to earn more as part time workers and not lose the benefit at 70 cents in the dollar as it is now.
- This party cares.I’m sure the Labour Party cares a lot more about homelessness than it did in 1984, when in the run-up to the Snap Election it staged a mock soup kitchen in Auckland’s Upper Queen Street to draw attention to the failure of the Muldoon government’s housing policies. Dozens of news media and wellwishers turned up for the event, and were ladled out helpings of soup.Unfortunately, a couple of real homeless people also turned up and tried to get a plate of soup for their worthless selves—but were swiftly hustled away by Labour Party “security” before their shabbiness and unkemptness could lower the tone.The Labour Party of 1984 was dominated by such caring people as Roger Douglas, Richard Prebble, Mike Moore, Geoffrey “Footstool” Palmer, and Trevor De Cleene. I hope it’s slightly more caring these days.
- Monty Python-esque. Probably still happen today.
- I wouldn’t trust Palmer or Moore to look after a dog, let alone have any say in a welfare policy for people.
- Spreading lies again Moronissey ?prove it or remove it.
- Spreading lies again Moronissey ?Excuse me? When have I “spread lies” here or anywhere else?prove it or remove it.It was reported in the New Zealand Herald in June 1984, and quite possibly in theAuckland Star as well. Why don’t you get off your useless asssss and find it for yourself?