Monday 16 April 2018

Jack Tame's "interview" of Chris Liddell (Mar. 13, 2016)

The Chairman8
As usual, National refused to debate on TV3’s The Nation.
Good to see the opposition front up.
  • Morrissey8.1
    I watched the Chris Liddell “interview”, which was, as one would expect seeing that he was talking to the woefully ill-informed and under-prepared Jack Tame, nothing more than an uninterrupted free podium.
    Liddell talked with a lowered, croaky voice to convey intellectual depth and he continually raised his eyebrows to convey sincerity. Jack Tame, who might be the shallowest person “working” in the New Zealand media, failed to hold him to account for anything he said—even when Liddell called John Kasich a “respected, moderate governor”. Seconds after that howler, Liddell revealed that in 2012 he supported Mitt Romney.
    Calling John Kasich “respected” and “moderate” and confessing to being a Romney supporter would have indicated to any viewer with an IQ above room temperature that Liddell was neither a serious nor credible commentator. But Jack Tame, that great gorgeous empty grin notwithstanding, seemed to comprehend not a single word Liddell said.
    • joe908.1.1
      Liddell’s intimation the FBI could make decisions about prosecuting Clinton was dead wrong too.
      In an ordinary case, that would not be a point worth making. The FBI routinely conducts major investigations in collaboration with Justice Department prosecutors — usually from the U.S. attorney’s office in the district where potential crimes occurred. That is because the FBI needs the assistance of a grand jury. The FBI does not have authority even to issue subpoenas, let alone to charge someone with a crime. Only federal prosecutors may issue subpoenas, on the lawful authority of the grand jury. Only prosecutors are empowered to present evidence or propose charges to the grand jury. And the Constitution vests only the grand jury with authority to indict — the formal accusation of a crime. In our system, the FBI can do none of these things.
      No Justice Department, no grand jury. No grand jury, no case — period. As a technical matter, no matter how extensively the FBI pokes around on its own, no one can be a subject of a real investigation — i.e., one that can lead to criminal charges — unless and until there is a grand jury. That does not happen until the Justice Department hops on board.
      google cache because NRO.
    • The Chairman8.1.2
      As usual, a good breakdown, Morrissey.
    • The Chairman8.2.1
      Allowing the opposition to control the narrative while showing voters where their priorities lie.
  • Skinny8.3
    +1
    People organising gigs of a political nature would be wise to always invite the 3 main party’s and then National if the main party’s leaders agree to front up. Either way Natcorp get it in the neck!
  • cowboy8.4
    It was interesting to see a pretty coherent showing from the 3 opposition leaders. Clearly they have plenty of low hanging fruit to work with but they broadly seemed on the same page with issues around the dairy situation and Immigration/foreign investment which are going to be two massive issues playing out in 2017.
    Contrast with Bill English’s “nothing to see here” interview on Q&A this morning. (link not yet online)
    There seems a clear line drawn between the opposition being prepared to get involved directly with some sort of support package for the “too big to fail” dairy sector and the govts ideological hands off approach. While I ordinarily would not be in support of direct govt intervention my feeling is that this is going to be such a significant issue that the govt will be forced to take some action or face the consequences of significant 1980s style economic and social dislocation in the provinces. I think the opposition are being quite canny in positioning themselves ahead of the curve and waiting for the govt to pulled kicking and screaming towards their position.
    • The Chairman8.4.1
      “It was interesting to see a pretty coherent showing from the 3 opposition leaders. Clearly they have plenty of low hanging fruit to work with but they broadly seemed on the same page with issues around the dairy situation and Immigration/foreign investment which are going to be two massive issues playing out in 2017.”
      Indeed, it was good to see. It almost looked like a Government in waiting.
      Bill was using the line the TPP will help. It will allow more NZ farms to end up in offshore ownership.
      According to Treasury (see link below) that’s a good thing. Yeah right.
      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11602794

No comments:

Post a Comment