Kerre Woodham's comments coming back to haunt her
Posted by Radio Transcripts Ltd (Friday, July 10, 2009)
After reading a post by our colleague Kerre ohoWmad ("Lighten up on
Clayton Weatherston"), one Kerry Woodham gritted her teeth, flounced
her hair, pursed her lips like a cat's arse and tapped out the
following:
>
> The comments being attributed to me are not mine.
No, everyone except our friend Scrooge could see that. But anyone who
cares to look can see that Kerre ohoWmad's comments are clearly in the
spirit of similar comments you, and most of your colleagues, made
after the knife-killing of an Auckland teenager.
cares to look can see that Kerre ohoWmad's comments are clearly in the
spirit of similar comments you, and most of your colleagues, made
after the knife-killing of an Auckland teenager.
>
> I have very strong
> feelings about this trial but I am unable to express them publicly
> because of sub judice rules.
> I have very strong
> feelings about this trial but I am unable to express them publicly
> because of sub judice rules.
"Sub judice rules"? You and your colleagues showed no concern for sub
judice as you ran sustained campaigns of defamation against Pihema
Cameron and then against Kirsten Dunne-Powell.
judice as you ran sustained campaigns of defamation against Pihema
Cameron and then against Kirsten Dunne-Powell.
>
> I am disappointed that some coward feels
> the need to hide behind my name and identity.
It's called "spoofing". Kerre ohoWmad's voice is not a fabrication,
it's barely even an exaggeration. It's an extrapolation of your
statements on air, and in print, over a substantial amount of time.
Your words are coming back to haunt you.
> I am disappointed that some coward feels
> the need to hide behind my name and identity.
It's called "spoofing". Kerre ohoWmad's voice is not a fabrication,
it's barely even an exaggeration. It's an extrapolation of your
statements on air, and in print, over a substantial amount of time.
Your words are coming back to haunt you.
>
> I don't mind criticism
> I don't mind criticism
Good. That's encouraging.
>
> - even downright abuse! -
That was not abuse. That was, fundamentally, your voice.
> - even downright abuse! -
That was not abuse. That was, fundamentally, your voice.
>
> when it's made openly and to my face (or my
> ear, if people are phoning me on air) - but this sort of craven
> nastiness epitomises the very worst of the internet.
> when it's made openly and to my face (or my
> ear, if people are phoning me on air) - but this sort of craven
> nastiness epitomises the very worst of the internet.
The "craven nastiness" of that post is all yours. We simply held up
the mirror.
the mirror.
>
> Sorry for
> crashing your group,
> Sorry for
> crashing your group,
How have you "crashed" this group? It's a public site.
>
> but somebody sent me the link and I had to
> respond.
> but somebody sent me the link and I had to
> respond.
We think the best response you could make would be to re-assess your
on-air comments of the past two years, and then, if you were are up to
it, to apologise.
>
> Kerre Woodham
on-air comments of the past two years, and then, if you were are up to
it, to apologise.
>
> Kerre Woodham
No comments:
Post a Comment